If you've ever worked in a large (or medium, or small) organization, you probably know that there are always changes that could be made to make operations a bit more efficient, or to reduce unnecessary expenses. In most workplaces, these are not things that would be readily apparent to a
stranger who just walked in the door one day.
The potential improvements that would benefit most organizations are usually things that are noticed by people familiar with the current workflow, people who know what is being done and what the outcomes are. In any case, suddenly
eliminating half (or three-fourths or a third or a quarter) of the employees would not improve productivity. And, even if removing some employees would increase efficiency, only someone who knows what tasks are being done, and by whom, could correctly decide who to let go.
The same concept applies to reducing the budget. An outsider might arbitrarily declare, as some sort of eccentric guiding principle, that everyone should just stop ordering office supplies, or that nobody should ever spend more than $5.00 on pencils. In many offices, people
may be wasting paper or overwatering the plants. Nevertheless, only someone who actually works there can see what is necessary and useful, and what is wasteful.
If I wanted to improve efficiency and economy in an organization, I would take some time to work with the people and help
them to identify areas for improvement. If I wanted to completely destroy an organization so that it could not fulfill its purpose, I would send in an angry clown to just fire half the staff for no reason, and I'd take away the operating budget and order a halt to all normal procedures.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you are a real person making a real comment, your comment will appear after moderation. Thank you for your patience.