Touring the Valley
The Valley is wherever I am at the moment.
Achievements and Honors
George Washington did not spend his time as President campaigning to get the nation's capital city named after him. He did not build monuments to himself, nor did he fantasize about the time when statues and monuments in his honor would exist throughout the country. He did not hope to become a king, and never portrayed himself as one, but instead expressed his view that the creation of an American monarchy was repugnant.
Martin Luther King Jr. did not dream that one day city streets would bear his name, or that there would be a grand statue honoring him in Washington DC, or that his legacy would be remembered by a federal holiday. His dream was that someday Americans would live together in "an oasis of freedom and justice," where they would "not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." He worked toward achieving that goal, not toward personal enrichment and autocratic power. He recieved the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, without asking for it or complaining about others who had received it. In his acceptance speech, he did not brag about his personal sacrifices and achievements, but instead accepted the prize on behalf of the civil rights movement, describing the struggles and injustices that he still hoped could be remedied.
In his inaugural address, President John F. Kennedy said, "My fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you--ask what you can do for your country." He added, "My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." Long before the presidency, as a Navy lieutenant in World War II, he saved the lives of fellow crew members after their boat was destroyed. Although he was awarded a medal for his courage and leadership, he did not go on to make speeches bragging about the incident. As president, he worked long hours, staying informed by reading six daily newspapers, as well as reports from his advisors. He and his wife made the White House a center of American culture, restoring the rooms and hosting people from the arts and sciences. Kennedy founded the Peace Corps, which he did not name the Kennedy Corps, an organization of volunteers helping people throughout the world.
These men, and others like them, understood the true nature of achievement. Achievement is what you do, not what you say. Achievement consists of what is actually accomplished. It does not depend on praise from others or symbols like statues and medals. The most important reward is knowing in your heart that what you did was worthwhile and that you succeeded.
I could have a trophy shop make a fancy basketball trophy with my name on it and then give a party where my friends hand me the trophy and shake my hand. That would not make me a great basketball player. There would be no achievement, just a meaningless lump of metal.
Certainly, it is often enjoyable for an accomplished person to receive recognition and to be given symbols and souvenirs commemorating their achievement. They may treasure their prizes because of the symbolic value that recalls the great satisfaction that comes from doing meaningful things, and because they feel honored to have been acknowledged. I am fond of my trophies and medals because they remind me of the work I did to earn them, and because it felt good to have my work appreciated. If I had been gifted someone else's prize, or if I had created a false award for myself, I wouldn't care about those things.
Yet there are some people who think that the prize itself is an achievement. For them earning it isn't necessary. For example, imagine a man who fantasizes about receiving a Purple Heart, neither knowing nor caring that it is given to soldiers wounded in the line of duty. He wants a trinket that allows him to play at being someone he could never be. He definitely doesn't want to serve in the military and risk getting hurt. A person who actually donates a hospital to the city certainly deserves to have his name on the building. But imagine someone who just wants to see his name on the wall, although he contributed nothing to the hospital, and doesn't even care about the lives being saved.
Currently, we are subjected to the daily spectacle of a high-ranking official who obsessively denigrates others while bragging about himself. According to him, every problem in the country is the fault of his predecessors and rivals. He boasts of his own imagined knowledge and skill, claiming that he can solve all our troubles, despite many years of failing to do so. His time is not spent studying the situation or devising effective plans. He does not do anything recognizable as work, but uses his waning energy to complain about the unfair treatment he recieves, insulting and berating anyone who is not sufficiently subservient to his will, accumulating wealth through blatantly corrupt schemes, crudely undermining decades of international goodwill, implementing policies that threaten the health and safety of the people while destroying the nation's natural resources, and directing expensive projects designed to feed his narcissistic need for fame and attention. He has admitted that no one will honor him after he is gone, so he feels compelled to honor himself now, perhaps not aware that his pointless monuments will quickly be dismantled and forgotten.
The Threat of a Fake Emergency
The head of The U.S. government's executive branch has threatened to declare a "national emergency" for the purpose of taking over elections, if Congress does not pass a radical voter-suppression bill.
Elections were held as usual in the U.S. during the War of 1812, the Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Elections were held as usual during the 1918–1920 flu pandemic, and the recent Covid pandemic. Elections were held as usual a year after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Elections continue as usual after hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and earthquakes. One might wonder, what kind of "national emergency" would be so extreme that it would require the federal government to take over and change election procedures?
The real emergency is the commander-in-chief's obvious mental decline. Supressing or suspending elections will not fix that problem, which requires that citizens vote to unseat his enablers.
- Take Trump's Threats Seriously
- White House Open to Unconstututional Plot
- Chilling Response
- List of Dictatorial Takeovers
- SAVE Act Would Block Millions From Voting
- What is the SAVE America Act?
- Neuroscientist Diagnoses Trump's Brain Damage
Cutting it Off
In this article, we take a look at some of the surgeries commonly used to remove or modify certain body parts. What is being done, and why?
Circumcision
Circumcision is a surgical procedure that removes the foreskin from a penis. Historically, circumcision has been practiced routinely in many different cultures, often as part of a ritual celebrating a boy's promotion to adulthood, or as a religious requirement, or for hygenic reasons. Worldwide, around 38% of men are circumcised. Circumcision appears to have health benefits, helping to prevent certain infections and to reduce the spread of HIV and other sexually-transmitted infections. Research indicates that circumcision usually has neither a poitive nor a negative effect on sexual function or enjoyment. Some medical authorities recommend circumcision for newborns, while others consider it unnecessary. When performed under proper medical conditions, circumcision is a low-risk procedure, although it causes pain.
A growing anti-circumcision movement argues that the procedure's risks outweigh its benefits, and that it is abusive to perform it on minors. In the U.S., major medical organizations have taken the position that infant circumcision is a choice that should be left to parents.
Castration
Castration is the removal or deactivation of the testes (testicles), and includes removal through surgery or mutilation. Surgical removal of the testes is called oriechtomy. The most common reason for oriechtomy is to treat cancer, and it is also a procedure undergone by persons transitioning from male to female (who may also choose to have the penis removed). If both testes are removed, the production of sperm and testosterone ceases. Chemical castration uses drugs to stop hormone production. It is sometimes used as a cancer treatment, and is also occasionally imposed on sex offenders.
Historically, physical castration has been performed on men as a component of slavery, as a terror tactic in war, or as a punishment for certain crimes. It is performed on animals to prevent overpopulation and to obtain desired temperament and behavior. In antiquity, castrated slaves were called eunuchs, and were used as harem attendants. In some historical societies, eunuchs had special roles as trusted royal attendants or guardians. In some cases, men performed self-castration for religious reasons, committing themselves to celibacy. If castration occurs before puberty, the man will retain a high-pitched voice in adulthood. For this reason, boy singers were sometimes castrated to maintain their soprano voices. They were known as castrati. The practice was ended in the late 19th century.
Penectomy
Penectomy is surgical removal of all or part of the penis. This may be necessary due to cancer or other very serious illnesses. Because penile cancer is rare, this is not a common procedure. In some caes, a phalloplasty, or penis reconstruction surgery, may be performed, although this is a complex surgery with a high risk of complications. People undergoing sex reassignment surgery may choose penecotomy, or may choose to use the penile tissue for vaginoplasty.
Although many people equate penis removal with castration or emascualtion, they are not exactly the same. Castration is the removal of the testicles. Emasculation is the removal of all external male genitalia. The history, purposes, medical consequences, and long-term complications of these procedures are different.
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomy is surgery to take out part or all of the prostate gland. This is a common surgery to treat prostate cancer, and may also be used for other conditions. A radical prostatectomy removes the entire prostate and some surrounding tissues. Sometimes nearby lymph nodes are also removed. A simple or partial prostatectomy removes the interior of the prostate, leaving the exterior intact. This surgery is typically used for enlarged prostate. Possible side effects of prostatectomy include urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction or other sexual problems, and the usual problems associated with any major surgery.
Mastectomy
Mastectomy is the surgical removal of the breast, typically performed to treat or prevent cancer. Sometimes a mastectomy includes removal of nearby lymph nodes. Sometimes chest wall muscles are also removed. A partial mastectomy, called a lumpectomy, removes a tumor and a small border of healthy tissue around it, rather than the entire breast. In some cases, the skin and/or nipple are preserved, either for appearance or in peparation for possible reconstructive surgery. Persons undergoing gender reassignment sometimes choose mastectomy to obtain a more masculine appearance.
Breast reduction surgery, known as mammoplasty, is not exactly the same as mastectomy. Mammoplasty removes some fat, tissue, and skin to create smaller breasts. In some cases, liposuction is used to remove excess fat. Mammoplasty is performed on women with very large breasts that cause pain and interfere with life activities.
Hysterectomy
A hysterectomy is surgery to remove the uterus. This is performed to treat cancer, fibroid tumors, and some other conditions. Without a uterus, pregnancy is impossible, and monthly periods will not occur. A "supracervical hysterectomy" or partial hysterectomy, removes the upper portion of the uterus, leaving the cervix intact. Cervical cancer is still possible, and regular pap smears are needed. A "total hysterectomy" removes the uterus and cervix. Because the ovaries are still present, hormone cycles still occur. A "total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy" removes the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. A "radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy" removes the uterus, cervix, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and the upper part of the vagina. This type of surgery is done to treat cancer. Any time the ovaries are removed, the patient will experience immediate menopause, although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be used to prevent this.
Some research indicates that many hysterectomies are unnecessary, performed due to misdiagnoses, or to treat conditions that could be treated some other way. Unnecessary hysterectomies are often characterized as symptomatic of gender and class discrimination, lack of informed consent, and even human rights violations.
Female Genital Mutilation
Female genital mutilation (FGM) is the removal of all or part of female external genitalia for non-medical reasons. This is a practice that is carried out on minors, as part of a longstanding pattern of discrimination and abuse against women and girls, typically with the intention of limiting and controlling women's sexuality. FGM is internationally recognized as a human rights violation, but is still practiced in around 31 countries, and affects millions of people. Supporters of FGM often try to make it sound benign by calling it "female circumcision," but this is a false analogy. FGM has no health benefits, no religious or cultural meaning, and places the victim at risk for pain, infection/death, and urinary problems, as well as long-term or permanent complications, recurring infections, reproductive harm, chronic pain, childbirth complications, and mental health issues.
Resources
Does He or Doesn't He?
For many years, rumors about Donald Trump's body odor and possible urinary and fecal incontinence have circulated on social media. The gossip is often accompanied by photos that may have been manipulated or generated with AI. In some cases, real, undoctored photos that seem to reveal unpleasant stains or strange bulges are enlarged, scrutinized, and submitted as proof.
How credible are the claims about trump's personal hygiene?
• Noel Casler is a writer, podcaster, and comedian who worked on Celebrity Apprentice for six seasons. He has often shared his observations of Donald and other Trumps. Among other things, Casler has said that Trump would frequently soil himself, as a result of drug addiction and poor diet. Casler has also commented on Trump's corruption and moral turpitude. As a witness who was present while the show was being produced, Casler has credibility.
• Adam Kinzinger, a former Republican Congressman, described Donald Trump's odor as a blend of "armpits, ketchup, a butt and makeup" and said, "I'm genuinely surprised how people close to Trump haven't talked about the odor." As someone who has been in physical proximity to Trump on many occasions, Kinzinger has credibility.
• Kathy Griffin, a comedian who appeared twice on The Apprentice, has said that Trump "smelled really bad." Having met Trump in a professional context gives Griffin's claim credibility.
• Various anonynous and semi-anonymous persons on social media claim to have met Trump and to have noticed his terrible body odor. Without knowing who they are or what the details were of these encounters, their credibility is low.
• Bob Woodward, a journalist who interviewed Trump and wrote books about him, was quoted as having posted on Twitter that Trump smelled bad. However, this tweet, widely shared online, was fake, posted by a satire account. There have been other fake stories, supposedly from staff members who find it hard to work around Trump because of his odor. There have been other posts from people who claim, without evidence, to have been contacted by credible sources reporting incontinence and foul odors.
• Many observers view photos of odd-looking bulges in Trump's pants as evidence of diapers. Photos from news agencies are credible, in that they depict what was actually seen, but there is no proof of what caused the bulges. Unless he removes his pants in public, what he wears underneath them is still just speculation.
• Some photos of events appear to show people physically distancing themselves from Trump, standing by him but turning away, or making facial expressions that indicate distaste. There are also photos that show people standing near him and smiling. During interviews, Trump is usually seated several feet away from the interviewer. This practice started during the Covid epidemic, and is now standard procedure.
• A conventional online search along with an AI query did not find any reports of people claiming that Trump smells good. Nor was there any evidence that people close to Trump have actively denied the bad smell claims.
• Donald Trump has a history of filing lawsuits for defamation, but so far has not sued anyone over the incontinence or odor claims.
Does It Matter?
Many people experience incontinence because of health problems beyond their control. By itself, this is not necessarily a sign of mental decline, immorality, or inability to work. However, incontinence can be a symptom of Alzheimer's and other dementia types, as well as a sign of some other diseases. The same is true of neglected personal hygiene. The physical and mental health status of the White House occupant is a legitimate, important concern for Americans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


